Our editorial process is built to keep you — the reader — at the center. Here's how we decide what to publish, how we vet it, and how we correct it when we get something wrong.
Sourcing standards
Every health claim on ThriveDraft is traceable to one of three primary source types: peer-reviewed research, guidelines from recognized expert bodies (ACSM, NIH, WHO, etc.), or direct commentary from a credentialed clinician. We don't cite blog posts, press releases, or Instagram infographics as evidence.
Review process
Every article is reviewed by at least one editor with domain expertise. Clinical articles (e.g., anything involving medications, diagnoses, or clinical nutrition) get an additional pass from a licensed practitioner before publication. We don't run AI-generated summaries as articles.
Conflicts of interest
Authors and reviewers must disclose any financial or personal relationship with products, brands, or programs they cover. We don't accept paid placements disguised as editorial coverage. If a piece is sponsored, it's labeled clearly at the top.
Corrections
If we publish something wrong — a misquoted statistic, a misattributed study, a recommendation that turns out to be outdated — we correct it openly. Corrections are noted at the bottom of the article with the date and a description of what changed.
What we won't publish
- Detox protocols, cleanses, or "toxin" claims not grounded in pharmacology
- Extreme caloric restriction or eating-disorder-adjacent recommendations
- Individual supplement claims not backed by at least two independent trials
- "Superfood" framing — no food is magic
Medical disclaimer
ThriveDraft is educational media, not medical advice. See our medical disclaimer for the full statement.